Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links. But like it was already explained, at the time it came out it was the only option. Which of these options provides the best performance for the controller? Thread starter raptori Start date Mar 6, So I think that the only thing you can do really is wait until you’re able to upgrade to a board that has SATA 3 ports that are controlled by the Intel chipset. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page:

Uploader: Bakora
Date Added: 5 October 2016
File Size: 57.6 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 87035
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Find all posts by Baytar.

Marvell and SSD Performance – The Corsair User Forums

Marvell 9128 I think that the only thing you can do really is wait until you’re able to upgrade to a board that has SATA 3 ports that are controlled by marvell 9128 Intel chipset. I don’t own an SSD so I can’t test it on “very amrvell drives. So relax, you have bought quite possibly the best SSD on the market today, I only use Samsung for my Enterprise builds.

Whatever SSD your heart desire. I have no idea when you bought it, so can not comment on that. Just enjoy the single most noticeable upgrade of the last 5 years. Yes the Marvell is horribly slow compared marvell 9128 Intel Sata 3 Controller. Personally I would go with an Intel series or Sandisk Extreme.

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links. Overall, read marvell 9128 are about the same between the two http: While in mzrvell this means your video card will be slower, the reality is if marvell 9128 have a single GPU, nothing available today can fully utilize even a PCIe 2.

Hi The thing is I think most people including motherboard manufacturers gave up on the Marvell controller marvell 9128 it mafvell supposed to be, and just settled for using it as a SATA2 rather than the SATA3 that it should have been.

Intel ICH10 vs Marvell 9128

Last edited by Wired; at marvell 9128 Last edited by Undertoker; at Irocing New Member Mar 7, But things have marvell 9128 on heaps since April marvell 9128 the board was a revamp of the Rampage II same Intel X58 chipset but just with some new tech added on.

Sign In Sign Up. I’m thinking about cancelling the order but can’t decide yet. On the X58 boards and the Marvel controller ,Sata 3, There are issues as to not natively supported.

If you had a board with SATA 3 Intel ports and if the Marvell 9128 were connected to one of them, then the performance would be superior to the Marvell 9128 ports. Best driver for the Marvell 6G Controller. High Speed Fan Club.

January 22, Marvell 9128 I don’t know personally marvvell well this updated firmware works yetbut there marvell 9128 people talking highly about it in the french forums at Station Drivers. Why hasn’t Gigabyte updated the driver for the ?

You need to install the updated MRU from Station Driver in order for it to communicate with the actual Marvell driver.

In addition to what HiVizMan already said, it is not possible to fix the performance of marvell 9128 controller with a driver, it is not performing that great because it is not a controller native marvell 9128 the chipset but an addon that uses, if I’m not mistaken, one PCIe lane. Thread starter raptori Start date Mar 6, The video cards likely get priority over other hardware, with the result you are seeing. I am running Windows 7 bit. Mine was much faster on the sata2 intel pch than the marvell sata3 that went to sata 1 marvlel sli.

Joined Sep 9, Messages 0. Intel ICH10 vs Marvell 9128 Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page: